Mercurial > hg > mercurial-crew-with-dirclash

comparison notes.txt @ 59:2bff7c0ea1d3

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Minor corrections
author mpm@selenic.com
date Thu, 12 May 2005 01:20:43 -0800
parents 45cc818f2445
children d7ce76d82876
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
58:2ab801e0ea9f 59:2bff7c0ea1d3
147 Most notably, Mercurial uses delta compression and repositories 147 Most notably, Mercurial uses delta compression and repositories
148 created with it will grow much more slowly over time. This also allows 148 created with it will grow much more slowly over time. This also allows
149 it to be much more bandwidth efficient. I expect repos sizes and sync 149 it to be much more bandwidth efficient. I expect repos sizes and sync
150 speeds to be similar to or better than BK, given the use of binary diffs. 150 speeds to be similar to or better than BK, given the use of binary diffs.
151 151
152 Mercurial is roughly the same performance as git and is faster in 152 Mercurial is roughly the same performance as git in some areas and is
153 others as it keeps around more metadata. One example is listing and 153 faster in others as it keeps around more metadata. One example is
154 retrieving past versions of a file, which it can do without reading 154 listing and retrieving past versions of a file, which it can do
155 all the changesets. This metadata will also allow it to perform better 155 without reading all the changesets. This metadata will also allow it
156 merges as described above. 156 to perform better merges as described above.
157 157
158 158