view src/os/unix/ngx_gcc_atomic_x86.h @ 7851:aa5f8825f24d

Resolver: fixed label types handling in ngx_resolver_copy(). Previously, anything with any of the two high bits set were interpreted as compression pointers. This is incorrect, as RFC 1035 clearly states that "The 10 and 01 combinations are reserved for future use". Further, the 01 combination is actually allocated for EDNS extended label type (see RFC 2671 and RFC 6891), not really used though. Fix is to reject unrecognized label types rather than misinterpreting them as compression pointers.
author Maxim Dounin <mdounin@mdounin.ru>
date Tue, 25 May 2021 15:17:41 +0300
parents d620f497c50f
children
line wrap: on
line source


/*
 * Copyright (C) Igor Sysoev
 * Copyright (C) Nginx, Inc.
 */


#if (NGX_SMP)
#define NGX_SMP_LOCK  "lock;"
#else
#define NGX_SMP_LOCK
#endif


/*
 * "cmpxchgl  r, [m]":
 *
 *     if (eax == [m]) {
 *         zf = 1;
 *         [m] = r;
 *     } else {
 *         zf = 0;
 *         eax = [m];
 *     }
 *
 *
 * The "r" means the general register.
 * The "=a" and "a" are the %eax register.
 * Although we can return result in any register, we use "a" because it is
 * used in cmpxchgl anyway.  The result is actually in %al but not in %eax,
 * however, as the code is inlined gcc can test %al as well as %eax,
 * and icc adds "movzbl %al, %eax" by itself.
 *
 * The "cc" means that flags were changed.
 */

static ngx_inline ngx_atomic_uint_t
ngx_atomic_cmp_set(ngx_atomic_t *lock, ngx_atomic_uint_t old,
    ngx_atomic_uint_t set)
{
    u_char  res;

    __asm__ volatile (

         NGX_SMP_LOCK
    "    cmpxchgl  %3, %1;   "
    "    sete      %0;       "

    : "=a" (res) : "m" (*lock), "a" (old), "r" (set) : "cc", "memory");

    return res;
}


/*
 * "xaddl  r, [m]":
 *
 *     temp = [m];
 *     [m] += r;
 *     r = temp;
 *
 *
 * The "+r" means the general register.
 * The "cc" means that flags were changed.
 */


#if !(( __GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ <= 7 ) || ( __INTEL_COMPILER >= 800 ))

/*
 * icc 8.1 and 9.0 compile broken code with -march=pentium4 option:
 * ngx_atomic_fetch_add() always return the input "add" value,
 * so we use the gcc 2.7 version.
 *
 * icc 8.1 and 9.0 with -march=pentiumpro option or icc 7.1 compile
 * correct code.
 */

static ngx_inline ngx_atomic_int_t
ngx_atomic_fetch_add(ngx_atomic_t *value, ngx_atomic_int_t add)
{
    __asm__ volatile (

         NGX_SMP_LOCK
    "    xaddl  %0, %1;   "

    : "+r" (add) : "m" (*value) : "cc", "memory");

    return add;
}


#else

/*
 * gcc 2.7 does not support "+r", so we have to use the fixed
 * %eax ("=a" and "a") and this adds two superfluous instructions in the end
 * of code, something like this: "mov %eax, %edx / mov %edx, %eax".
 */

static ngx_inline ngx_atomic_int_t
ngx_atomic_fetch_add(ngx_atomic_t *value, ngx_atomic_int_t add)
{
    ngx_atomic_uint_t  old;

    __asm__ volatile (

         NGX_SMP_LOCK
    "    xaddl  %2, %1;   "

    : "=a" (old) : "m" (*value), "a" (add) : "cc", "memory");

    return old;
}

#endif


/*
 * on x86 the write operations go in a program order, so we need only
 * to disable the gcc reorder optimizations
 */

#define ngx_memory_barrier()    __asm__ volatile ("" ::: "memory")

/* old "as" does not support "pause" opcode */
#define ngx_cpu_pause()         __asm__ (".byte 0xf3, 0x90")